When Rajnath Singh, India’s Defence Minister stood on the tarmac of Bhuj Air Base in Gujarat on , he delivered a stark warning to Pakistan over the contested Sir Creek strip. The warning, timed with the Hindu festival of Vijayadashami, stressed that any "reckless move" by Islamabad would trigger a "decisive response that could change both history and geography."
Background: Why Sir Creek matters
Sir Creek is a narrow, 96‑kilometre tidal inlet that forms part of the maritime boundary between the Kutch region of India and the Sindh province of Pakistan. Its shifting sandbars and mangrove‑filled channels have long made it a legal grey zone, with both sides claiming exclusive rights to the surrounding waters and the potential offshore oil and gas reserves.
Historically, the waterway was known as the "Ban Ganga" during the British Raj. After a 1914 survey by Sir Alden Cunningham, the creek took on the name of the British officer who charted it. Because the tidal range can exceed 5 metres, the exact mouth of the creek moves with the seasons, complicating any cartographic fix.
Vijayadashami address at Bhuj: The warning in detail
During the ceremonial "shastra puja" (weapon worship) that concluded the army’s Vijayadashami celebrations, Singh addressed a crowd of roughly 1,200 troops, senior officers, and a handful of journalists. He reminded the soldiers of the 1965 conflict – a reference he punctuated with a nod to the Indo‑Pak War of 1965 – saying, "We will not allow any repeat of those missteps." He then turned his gaze toward the audience, issuing a direct message: "The road to Karachi still runs through Sir Creek. If you try to alter that route, expect a response that reshapes maps and memories."
Singh’s words were not a generic bluster. He cited satellite imagery released earlier in the week that showed Pakistani naval engineers laying foundations for a forward‑operating base near the creek’s northern bank. "Such infrastructure, built under the cover of night, cannot be ignored," he warned.
Strategic stakes: Resources, trade routes, and security
- Energy potential: Independent surveys by the Indian Ministry of Petroleum estimate up to 1.5 billion barrels of oil equivalent in the basin surrounding Sir Creek.
- Maritime access: Control of the creek provides the shortest sea passage from the Arabian Sea to the inland ports of Kandla and Mundra.
- Security buffer: The inlet sits just 30 km from the strategic Indian airstrip at Bhuj, which serves as a forward operating base for both the Air Force and the Army.
For Pakistan, the creek offers a potential shortcut to the Indian Ocean, bypassing the longer route around the Kandla port. That’s why Islamabad has increasingly highlighted Sir Creek in its diplomatic talks since 2022.
Reactions from Islamabad and regional analysts
Pakistani military spokesperson Brigadier (Ret.) Azhar Khan, speaking from the ISPR office in Islamabad, dismissed Singh’s remarks as “political posturing.” He added, "India’s narrative ignores the fact that the creek has always been part of our maritime heritage, and any attempts to change the status quo will be met with proportional diplomatic and, if needed, defensive measures."
Indian analyst Neha Sharma, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic Studies, warned that "escalation in Sir Creek could quickly spill over into broader Indo‑Pak tensions," especially with both nations modernising their naval fleets.
Meanwhile, a senior diplomat from the United Kingdom, who asked to remain anonymous, cautioned both sides to keep the dispute within the “law‑of‑the‑sea” framework, noting that a unilateral move could damage regional trade worth an estimated $2 billion annually.
Potential fallout and next steps
If India were to launch a limited naval operation to halt Pakistan’s construction, the immediate effect would likely be a diplomatic protest lodged at the United Nations, followed by a possible request for a joint technical committee to demarcate the boundary. Conversely, a Pakistani pre‑emptive strike could trigger a broader military standoff, drawing in the United States, which maintains a defence partnership with New Delhi.
Both governments have signalled willingness to bring the issue back to the 1965‑era Simla Agreement, but trust remains thin. Singh’s public warning may be an attempt to force Islamabad back to the negotiating table before any irreversible infrastructure is cemented.
Historical context and the way forward
Since the 1965 War, Sir Creek has lingered in the background of Indo‑Pak talks, eclipsed by the larger Kashmir dispute. Yet, every time either side probes the boundary—whether through civilian fishing vessels or military reconnaissance—the tension spikes.
In 1997, both countries agreed to a joint survey, but the effort stalled when the United Nations failed to provide a neutral adjudicator. Since then, periodic confidence‑building measures—such as the 2005 maritime hotline—have softened the friction, but the underlying resource competition remains.
Looking ahead, any resolution will likely hinge on a tri‑partite arrangement involving India, Pakistan, and an international body such as the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). Until then, Singh’s warning serves as a reminder that the creek’s water may be shallow, but the geopolitical currents are anything but.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the Sir Creek dispute affect fishermen in the region?
Local fishermen from both Gujarat and Sindh often cross the unofficial line to chase shrimp and crabs. When either navy clamps down, crews can lose daily earnings of up to ₹2,500, and confrontations have occasionally turned violent, prompting calls for a clear, mutually‑recognised fishing zone.
What legal mechanisms exist to settle the Sir Creek issue?
Both countries can approach the International Court of Justice or the UN‑mandated dispute‑resolution panel under the 1972 Convention on the Law of the Sea. Past attempts faltered because neither side wanted a third‑party decision that might favour the other.
Why is the creek strategically important for India’s naval operations?
Control of Sir Creek shortens the maritime route to the major ports of Kandla and Mundra, allowing faster deployment of naval vessels and logistics ships. It also acts as a buffer protecting the Bhuj air base from potential amphibious threats.
What could trigger a military escalation over Sir Creek?
A direct clash between Indian and Pakistani naval patrols, or the demolition of a construction site that one side deems illegal, could spark a rapid escalation, pulling in regional powers and possibly inviting UN intervention.
Write a comment